How The Bachelor Franchise Perpetuates Racial and Gender Hierarchies

For more than two decades, The Bachelor franchise has offered a glossy promise: that love can be found in a hot tub, a private jet, or a group date choreographed to a slow-burn pop ballad. The format has exported itself from American network television to dozens of countries, including Australia, where it has been adapted for local audiences and treated, often breathlessly, as appointment viewing. Yet beneath the sequinned gowns and the manufactured drama, the show operates as a powerful engine of social sorting, one that consistently elevates whiteness, femininity performed within narrow limits, and a particular vision of heterosexual romance.

What makes the franchise culturally significant is not its realism but its repetition. Each season reinforces the same hierarchies through ritual: rose ceremonies, one-on-one dates, and eliminations that function as public lessons in desirability. Audiences in Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth tune in each arvo, and the format travels so well precisely because its core assumptions about who deserves love, and on what terms, remain untouched by cosmetic change.

The architecture of whiteness

Even when producers attempt to cast a wider net, the franchise's central premise still orbits white protagonists. The American original has cycled through white leads for most of its run, and when Black, Asian, or Indigenous-identifying contestants appear, they are routinely edited into supporting roles: the sassy best friend, the driven professional who is "too much," or the early departure whose arc is summarised in a single montage. The racial choreography is rarely accidental.

In Australia, where The Bachelor has run on Network Ten and later on streaming platforms, the casting patterns reflect similar priorities. Local seasons have leaned heavily on contestants who fit a recognisable Anglo-Australian template, with diverse contestants often introduced as cultural curiosities rather than as serious romantic contenders. The treatment of contestants of colour on home soil echoes what audiences see in imported seasons, suggesting that the franchise's racial grammar travels intact.

Gender scripts and the performance of femininity

The franchise's gender hierarchy is enforced through constant evaluation. Women are sized up not only by the Bachelor but by each other, by the camera, and by viewers at home, with judgment arriving in the form of cuts, captions, and cruel editing choices. A woman who speaks confidently is reframed as arrogant; a woman who cries is praised for her "vulnerability." The narrow band of acceptable femininity leaves little room for women whose personalities, ambitions, or bodies do not match the template.

This dynamic shows up in predictable patterns:

• Women who challenge the Bachelor are labelled "dramatic" or "difficult."
• Women who express ambivalence about marriage are cast as cold.
• Women of colour who decline to perform gratitude are positioned as ungrateful.
• Plus-sized contestants are routinely reduced to "body confidence" narratives rather than full romantic arcs.

The lesson, repeated across hundreds of episodes, is that women earn love by becoming smaller, softer, and more grateful. In Australian living rooms, where the show is often watched over a shared brekkie or with flatmates gathered on the couch, these lessons seep in quietly.

Race and the "diverse season" performance

Occasionally the franchise attempts to address its racial blind spots with what might be called a "diverse season": a reboot, a spinoff, or a casting push. These gestures tend to produce more diverse lineups but leave the underlying structure intact. The dates are still designed around the lead's interests. The eliminations still reward compliance. The proposal at the end still requires a woman to perform total surrender to a relationship defined entirely by the man.

In Australia, where Indigenous representation on reality television remains sparse and where conversations about race are often filtered through Anglo-majority assumptions, the franchise has rarely used its platform to interrogate whiteness. Instead, it treats diversity as a flavour to be sampled, not a structure to be questioned.

The makeover myth and beauty standards

The show's visual language reinforces its hierarchies. Contestants arrive in formalwear that looks borrowed from a Bondi spray tan salon, with hair and makeup styled to a uniform standard of polished femininity. Anyone who deviates is either coached into conformity or framed as an outlier. The makeover is not just aesthetic; it is ideological, training viewers to read deviation from a particular look as deviation from worthiness.

This is part of a broader media pattern, one explored in pieces like how YouTube beauty influencers are reinventing the makeover myth, which traces how makeover culture moves between platforms while keeping its core logic intact. The Bachelor is simply the oldest and most relentless vehicle for that logic.

Why audiences keep tuning in

If the franchise is so obviously regressive, why does it endure? Part of the answer lies in the comfort of ritual. Audiences know what to expect, and that predictability offers a kind of relief from the more chaotic textures of modern dating, from app burnout to the bingle-curated swipe. The Bachelor offers a fantasy of clarity: someone chooses, someone is chosen, and the messiness of real life is edited out.

In Australia, the show also plugs into a robust reality-TV ecosystem that includes MasterChef, Married at First Sight, and The Block. These programs share an appetite for emotional spectacle and for reducing complex lives to tidy arcs. The Bachelor is the genre's purest expression.

Resistance and the limits of reform

Calls to "fix" the franchise usually focus on casting, as though the problem were a hiring issue rather than a structural one. Meaningful resistance would require rethinking the format from the ground up: who holds power, how intimacy is staged, what kinds of bodies and desires count as central.

Some directions worth pursuing:

• Centring women, non-binary people, or queer leads in positions of structural power rather than as objects of pursuit.
• Replacing the elimination format with collaborative decision-making.
• Paying contestants fairly and providing aftercare for the public scrutiny they endure.
• Hiring writers and editors from communities the franchise has historically marginalised.

Without these shifts, the next season will look much like the last, just with slightly different spray tans.

If you live in Adelaide, Brisbane, Hobart, or anywhere with a reliable internet connection, you can subscribe to SCREAMING IN ALL CAPS for ongoing feminist media criticism. New essays on popular culture, gender, and representation land in your inbox each week.