Winnipeg, Canada Subscribe
🔍 Articles
Another feminist response to pop culture Learn More

Why BookTok Still Centres White Women

BookTok has changed how readers discover novels, revived interest in physical books and turned private reading habits into public performance. Across TikTok, Instagram and YouTube, creators recommend books through reaction videos, shelf tours, themed readathons and emotionally charged reviews. Yet the community’s most visible faces remain overwhelmingly white women.

That pattern is not explained by a lack of diverse readers. It reflects how platforms distribute attention, how publishers market books, whose expertise is treated as trustworthy and which stories are considered broadly relatable. Visibility is shaped by race, class, gender, sexuality, disability, age and the commercial logic of influencer culture.

For Australian readers, the issue is especially relevant. BookTok trends travel quickly through Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth, while local booksellers, libraries and publishers adapt to demand generated largely in the United States and United Kingdom. A critical look at the community asks who gets promoted, who gets paid and who is expected to make themselves legible to the algorithm.

The Face Of A “Universal” Reader

The familiar BookTok creator is often a young, conventionally attractive white woman speaking from a carefully arranged bedroom or home library. She may cry over a romance, rate a fantasy series or recommend “books that changed my life”. Her content appears personal, yet it fits a commercial template that brands can easily understand and reproduce.

Whiteness is frequently presented as neutral rather than cultural. White creators can discuss race, migration or colonialism as outside topics, while creators of colour are often expected to explain their identities, defend their reading choices or represent an entire community. Their content can be treated as niche even when the books they discuss have mass appeal.

This imbalance affects the meaning of literary authority. A white woman’s enthusiasm is often framed as universal reader response; a First Nations, Asian Australian, Black or Muslim creator may be read as speaking only to a demographic category. The difference is not taste. It is the unequal power to define what counts as ordinary.

Algorithms Reward Familiarity

TikTok’s recommendation system favours fast engagement, frequent posting and recognisable formats. Those conditions reward creators with time, privacy, stable internet access and money to buy new releases. They also favour faces that audiences and advertisers have already been trained to see as commercially safe.

Publishers amplify this pattern through advance copies, launch events and influencer mailouts. When a white creator’s video performs well, the result can become a feedback loop: more free books, more invitations, stronger metrics and greater visibility. A creator outside the dominant image may need to generate far higher engagement before receiving comparable attention.

Australian BookTok is shaped by the same dynamics, even when the content is local. A Melbourne creator filming in a chain bookstore can make a US release seem instantly available, while a reader in regional Queensland may have limited access to independent shops or expensive imported editions. The platform can make abundance look universal when it is unevenly distributed.

Publishing And Retail Set The Terms

BookTok does not operate separately from the publishing industry. Marketing departments monitor viral posts, negotiate creator campaigns and use online excitement to influence stock orders. When the most visible influencers are white women, publishers may conclude that their preferences represent the safest route to sales.

The Australian market has its own pressures. Books can cost more because of print runs, shipping and exchange rates, and local writers compete for attention with heavily promoted international releases. A viral recommendation can empty shelves at a Sydney or Adelaide shop, while an Australian novel by a First Nations author may receive less sustained promotion once its initial publicity cycle ends.

Retail displays also shape discovery. “BookTok made me buy it” tables often feature the same romance, fantasy and young adult titles circulating internationally. These genres are valuable and deserve serious attention, but a narrow selection can push out memoir, poetry, literary fiction, translated work and writing grounded in Indigenous sovereignty.

Whose Stories Become Trends

Diversity is sometimes welcomed when it can be packaged as a trend. A publisher may promote a novel by a writer of colour as an essential “conversation starter”, while the creator is asked to perform gratitude, trauma or cultural explanation. The book becomes consumable proof of progress rather than part of a living literary tradition.

First Nations literature requires particular care in Australia. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander writers are not simply providers of educational content for white audiences. Their work exists within ongoing struggles over land, history, sovereignty and representation. The Uluru Statement from the Heart, debates about constitutional recognition and the continuing effects of colonisation cannot be reduced to aesthetic themes for a reading challenge.

The same problem appears with queer and disabled writers. Their books may become popular when they offer an emotionally accessible lesson, but creators can be ignored when they discuss structural violence, poverty or anger. Visibility often depends on being palatable rather than being fully heard.

Visibility Depends On More Than Talent

A useful way to understand the gap is to compare the conditions different creators bring to the same platform.

Factor Creators Favoured By The Mainstream Creators Facing Greater Barriers
Access to books Frequent purchases, advance copies and paid promotions Library borrowing, limited budgets or fewer review copies
Audience expectations Seen as broadly relatable Pressured to explain identity or represent a community
Brand safety Usually treated as commercially predictable Scrutinised for political opinions or “controversy”
Content labour Can focus on enthusiasm and aesthetics Often performs education, context and emotional labour
Discoverability Benefits from established formats and networks May need stronger engagement to receive equal reach

This does not mean every white creator is wealthy, influential or intentionally exclusionary. Nor does it mean creators of colour form a single political group. The point is structural: individual kindness cannot erase patterns built into publishing, platform design and audience behaviour.

Creators also need protection from extractive expectations. Asking someone to recommend “diverse books” can sound supportive while turning unpaid cultural labour into a permanent obligation. A healthier community would pay for expertise, credit sources, avoid tokenism and allow creators to discuss books without becoming lessons in identity.

How Readers Can Broaden Their Feeds

Readers can make practical changes without treating diversity as a shopping challenge. The first step is to notice whose videos appear repeatedly, whose reviews lead to sales and whether the feed presents the same narrow idea of a desirable reader.

Useful habits include:

A more accountable BookTok culture also requires changing how engagement works:

For readers exploring critical literary commentary, independent book commentary can offer a useful alternative to purely promotional influencer content. The goal is not to replace one canon with another, but to build a richer reading ecosystem where different forms of knowledge carry weight.

Building A More Inclusive BookTok

Platforms could begin by making creator partnerships more transparent and commissioning a wider range of reviewers. Publishers should track who receives advance copies, paid campaigns and event invitations, rather than relying on familiar influencer lists. Representation needs to be measured in budgets and opportunities, not just in themed promotional graphics.

Australian organisations also have policy tools available. The Online Safety Act does not solve algorithmic bias, but stronger platform accountability and accessible reporting systems matter when marginalised creators face racist abuse or coordinated harassment. Copyright and fair remuneration debates matter too, because creators’ reviews generate commercial value even when their labour is treated as casual posting.

Audiences hold power as well. Buying from independent Australian booksellers, requesting underrepresented titles from libraries and subscribing to creators can shift the market. The publication’s feminist mission offers a useful framework for asking how culture reflects power rather than accepting popularity as proof of merit.

BookTok can remain joyful while becoming more honest about its hierarchies. White women should not be expelled from literary conversation, but their dominance should no longer be mistaken for neutrality. A stronger reading culture makes room for many kinds of expertise, including voices that have been present all along but rarely amplified.

Support reviewers whose work expands your reading life, share their recommendations with credit and ask booksellers and publishers for broader campaigns. The future of BookTok will be shaped by what audiences choose to watch, fund and treat as worth hearing.