Winnipeg, Canada Subscribe
🔍 Articles
Another feminist response to pop culture Learn More

What Main Character Energy Gets Wrong About Oppression

“Main character energy” began as a playful way to describe confidence, self-possession and the feeling that your life deserves attention. Online, the phrase can encourage people to dress boldly, take themselves seriously and stop shrinking for other people’s comfort. That appeal is understandable in a culture that teaches women, queer people and racialised people to be agreeable before they are ambitious.

The problem begins when a personal mindset becomes a political explanation. The main character energy meme gets wrong about systemic oppression is the suggestion that visibility, confidence or the right aesthetic can overcome institutions built to distribute safety and opportunity unevenly. A person can feel powerful and still be underpaid, surveilled, excluded or disbelieved.

Confidence Cannot Dismantle A Structure

The meme turns liberation into a performance of self-belief. Its implied storyline is familiar: stop waiting for permission, romanticise your daily life and behave as if the world is ready to reward your potential. That can be a useful emotional shift, but it cannot substitute for housing security, accessible healthcare, workplace rights or protection from violence.

Systemic oppression operates through policies, habits and institutions, not just through individual insults. A woman may confidently negotiate a salary and still face a gender pay gap. A First Nations teenager may know her worth and still encounter racial profiling. A disabled person can have excellent self-esteem while a building, hiring process or transport network continues to exclude them.

In Australia, the gap between online confidence and material power is visible in the cost-of-living crisis. A polished “soft life” video filmed in Sydney or Melbourne may present independence as a purchase, while renters are dealing with steep increases, insecure leases and overcrowded share houses. Telling people to act like the protagonist can obscure who gets the financial conditions required to live that fantasy.

The Algorithm Rewards A Marketable Self

Main character content looks personal, but it is also a product designed for circulation. Platforms reward recognisable stories, attractive visuals and quick emotional payoffs. “I chose myself” travels further than “my employer exploited casual workers while government policy protected landlords,” even when the second statement explains much more about a person’s life.

This is where individual branding can quietly replace collective politics. The self becomes a storefront: outfit, morning routine, skincare shelf, apartment and motivational caption. Australian creators navigate a relatively small advertising market, where brand deals, affiliate links and reality television exposure can make relatability commercially valuable. A person is encouraged to appear spontaneous while producing content with the discipline of a small media business.

That commercial pressure also shapes feminist language. Empowerment is easier to sell when it means buying the right product, leaving a bad date or becoming “that girl.” Structural analysis is harder to package because it asks audiences to notice labour, ownership and history. Even a discussion of online culture can be steered towards seasonal strategy rather than the conditions that make digital work profitable for some and precarious for others.

Visibility Is Unevenly Distributed

The meme assumes that everyone can step into the spotlight on equal terms. They cannot. Visibility may bring opportunity, but it can also bring harassment, racist abuse, outing, doxxing and professional punishment. The social cost of being seen is not evenly distributed across gender, race, class, sexuality or disability.

For white, thin, conventionally attractive women, self-display is often read as confidence. For women of colour, trans women and First Nations women, the same behaviour may be framed as aggressive, deceptive or attention-seeking. The demand to be visible can become another burden: explain your identity, educate the audience, disclose your trauma and remain composed while strangers debate your right to exist.

Australian public culture has its own version of this contradiction. A woman speaking firmly on a breakfast program or political panel may be labelled “a bit much,” while a confident man is praised as direct. The phrase “having a whinge” can dismiss legitimate complaints, particularly when they concern racism, sexism or economic inequality. Confidence does not control the audience’s bias.

Individual Resilience Can Hide Collective Responsibility

Resilience is often celebrated because it reassures institutions that people can survive conditions institutions have no intention of changing. The resilient worker accepts unpaid emotional labour. The resilient student manages inaccessible systems. The resilient survivor rebuilds quietly so nobody has to confront the violence that caused the damage.

A main-character narrative can produce the same effect. If success is framed as a matter of mindset, failure appears personal too. Someone who cannot leave an unsafe relationship may be judged insufficiently empowered. Someone who cannot turn a hobby into income may be accused of lacking hustle. Structural barriers disappear behind a vocabulary of choices.

Warning signs that the story has become individualistic

For Australians relying on Centrelink, juggling multiple casual jobs or waiting for an NDIS decision, motivational content can feel less like solidarity than a demand to perform optimism. The issue is not that resilience is false. It is that survival should not be mistaken for proof that the system works.

Collective Power Makes A Different Story

A feminist response does not require abandoning joy, style or self-confidence. It requires placing them in context. Dressing for yourself can be meaningful; it becomes politically limited when it is presented as the cure for discrimination. A person can enjoy being the main character while recognising that other people are not background characters in their life.

Collective action changes the plot. Tenants organising in a Melbourne building, workers joining a union, disability advocates campaigning for access, and First Nations communities defending land and sovereignty all challenge the idea that private transformation is enough. Their power comes from shared demands and sustained pressure, not from appearing effortlessly successful.

Ways to shift from performance to solidarity

This approach also makes room for contradiction. Someone can want a glamorous life and oppose exploitation. They can celebrate a promotion while supporting pay transparency. They can make ambitious art while questioning the platforms that monetise identity and attention.

Rewriting The Main Character Script

The best use of the meme is as a small refusal of shame, not a complete theory of justice. Feeling entitled to rest, pleasure and ambition matters, especially for people taught to apologise for their needs. Yet self-worth should lead towards broader questions: who has access to rest, whose ambition is punished and who is expected to make the system comfortable for everyone else?

Media criticism helps expose the gap between a compelling story and a complete one. Watch who gets framed as active, who is made into scenery and whose suffering becomes a lesson for someone else’s growth. Notice when a platform turns political anger into a lifestyle aesthetic, or when a brand borrows feminist language while maintaining unequal conditions behind the campaign.

Treat main character energy as a spark, then connect it to material demands. Back workplace organising, challenge racist and sexist narratives, pay creators fairly and make room for disabled, queer and First Nations voices without requiring them to perform gratitude. Confidence may open the door, but collective power decides who can enter, stay and change the building.