Winnipeg, Canada Subscribe
🔍 Articles
Another feminist response to pop culture Learn More

How Promising Young Woman Loses Its Feminist Nerve

Emerald Fennell’s Promising Young Woman arrives dressed as a revenge fantasy, a candy-coloured thriller about sexual violence, complicity and the social machinery that protects men. Carey Mulligan’s Cassie stalks nightlife, pretending to be incapacitated until supposedly “decent” men attempt to take advantage of her. The performance exposes a culture that treats women’s vulnerability as an invitation and male respectability as evidence of innocence.

Yet the film’s most troubling contradiction emerges when its story moves from exposing misogyny to resolving it. Cassie’s campaign against the men connected to Nina’s rape appears radical, but its final turn places her death, sacrifice and posthumous cleverness at the centre. The result is a film that identifies the failures of patriarchal justice while still relying on familiar ideas about the ideal female victim, redemptive suffering and spectacular punishment.

The revenge fantasy narrows a collective problem

Cassie’s targets include the men who assaulted Nina, the friends who laughed, the lawyer who minimised the case and the women who helped protect the perpetrators. This wider circle is one of the film’s strongest insights. Sexual violence rarely depends on one monstrous stranger; it is enabled by friends, institutions, reputations and the routine dismissal of women’s testimony.

The narrative gradually narrows that social critique into a personal mission. Nina’s experience becomes the reason for Cassie’s transformation, but Nina herself remains mostly absent, known through fragments and memories. Her interior life, anger and wishes are inaccessible. She functions as the moral engine of Cassie’s story rather than as a fully developed person whose life was stolen.

That choice matters because feminist storytelling should question whose pain receives narrative attention. Cassie gets the costumes, the witty threats and the elaborate plan. Nina gets a notebook, a photograph and a death that makes another woman’s revenge possible. The film condemns the erasure of victims while reproducing a version of it.

Cassie’s performance exposes a dangerous double standard

The early scenes are effective because they make viewers sit with uncertainty. Cassie appears drunk, then abruptly becomes lucid when a man crosses the line. Her act forces audiences to confront how quickly predatory behaviour can hide behind the language of flirtation, intoxication and misunderstanding. In Australia, where conversations about consent have intensified across universities, workplaces and nightlife venues, the scenario feels especially recognisable rather than fantastical.

The film also understands that “good men” are often protected by their branding. Ryan is charming, affectionate and apparently safe, yet he participated in the culture surrounding Nina’s assault. His betrayal cuts through the comforting fantasy that danger is always visible. A man can know the right language, work in a respected profession and still choose silence when accountability threatens his social position.

However, Cassie’s method risks turning consent education into a test of female vigilance. She must perform vulnerability, monitor men and design elaborate traps, while the men are rarely required to develop ethical awareness. The burden of preventing violence remains attached to women’s intelligence and preparedness. That is a familiar pattern in Australian public debates about drinking, clothing and “staying safe” on nights out: responsibility quietly returns to the person most at risk.

The film mistakes punishment for structural change

The final act reveals that Cassie has arranged for the men connected to Nina’s assault to face legal consequences. Her plan is meticulously engineered, and the delayed messages provide a satisfying sense that the perpetrators cannot escape. Yet the twist also transforms Cassie into a plot device whose greatest power arrives after she has been killed.

Her death is shocking, but it is not politically disruptive in the way the film seems to promise. The narrative asks viewers to mourn her and applaud her ingenuity at the same time. That combination can be cathartic, but it leaves patriarchal violence intact. Men remain the people who act, kill, testify and occupy institutions; Cassie’s agency becomes a final message sent from beyond the grave.

This is where the film’s feminist premise begins to betray itself. A genuine challenge to rape culture would need to imagine survivors having futures beyond revenge, grief and martyrdom. Instead, Cassie’s life is made meaningful through the punishment she arranges for others. Her death supplies the emotional climax, allowing the audience to leave with justice symbolically restored even though the structures that failed Nina have barely changed.

Style creates distance from the women it depicts

The pastel palette, pop soundtrack and heightened production design give Promising Young Woman a glossy surface that clashes with its subject matter. That clash can be productive: it reflects the way misogyny hides beneath polished workplaces, romantic gestures and respectable suburban identities. The film’s visual seduction also mirrors the social packaging of predatory men, who can appear harmless because their environments are attractive and familiar.

But the stylisation sometimes makes violence feel like a clever aesthetic experience. Cassie’s outfits, from the nurse costume to the schoolgirl-inspired looks, become part of the film’s visual argument, yet they can also invite the audience to consume her danger as fashion and performance. The question of who is being looked at, and for whose pleasure, sits uneasily beneath the film’s claims about female perspective. A useful discussion of this tension appears in the female gaze debate, particularly the difference between giving a woman visual control and genuinely centring her subjectivity.

For Australian audiences accustomed to Hollywood releases arriving through cinemas, streaming platforms and festival circuits in cities such as Melbourne and Sydney, this glossy style can make the film feel safely consumable. Its visual language travels easily across the global market, even when the social conditions it depicts require more sustained attention than a stylish thriller usually allows.

A feminist ending would refuse easy catharsis

The film’s defenders may argue that its bleak ending is precisely the point. Cassie cannot defeat a culture that has already taken Nina from her, and the compromised police investigation is hardly a fantasy of perfect justice. Her plan exposes the absurdity of relying on institutions that only act once evidence is theatrically undeniable.

That reading has force, but intention does not erase the effect of the storytelling choices. The film can criticise institutional failure while still rewarding the audience with an intricate revenge mechanism. It can condemn the treatment of women as disposable while making Nina’s death and Cassie’s sacrifice essential to its emotional architecture. These tensions are why the film remains compelling, but they are also why its politics do not fully withstand scrutiny.

A more accountable feminist thriller would place less weight on the exceptional woman who outsmarts everyone. It would give survivors community, complexity and ordinary time. It would treat justice as collective work rather than a private scheme, and it would make male accountability more than a final twist.

What viewers should carry beyond the film

Promising Young Woman is valuable because it makes its contradictions difficult to ignore. Its bright surfaces and bitter jokes expose the seductions of a culture that confuses charm with goodness, yet its ending falls back on the same sacrificial logic it appears to challenge. Read the film alongside feminist criticism, consent resources and survivor-centred voices, and keep its unresolved questions alive beyond the screen.